![]() |
|
Women Reporters Often Thrive in Danger Zones August 5, 2006 06:02 PM |
||
|
Although women have come a long way in the news business, they experience both advantages and costs when reporting in danger zones, according to a panel discussion sponsored by the Commission on the Status of Women Saturday morning. At the session, “Women Reporters in Danger: Have We Made Progress?,” Kim Landon, associate professor of journalism at Utica College in New York, led the discussion on women in these types of situations. “That’s changed,” Landon said. And her panel agreed. “The pool of reporters…changed (during Sept. 11),” said Suzanne Huffman, professor of journalism at Texas Christian University “The women were down there—right there on it. There was no big policy discussion.” “Women were not being stopped or told ‘no,’” Huffman said. “They went on the job and stayed on the job,” she said. In addition, Sylvester said for the book she interviewed a number of embedded female journalists working in Iraq.. “(They were) being allowed to go to the front with the men,” Sylvester said, “even when female military personnel couldn’t.” Dana Hull, staff writer for “The San Jose Mercury News,” said she went to Baghdad as an unembedded reporter and experienced similar advantages. Hull said she teamed up with a female Iraqi translator and visited the homes of local women, to find out if reconstruction was actually taking place. The Iraqi women were more comfortable talking to women, Hull said. They told her: “The worst thing about the occupation is that our husbands are unemployed…and they are home driving us crazy.” Nevertheless, Huffman said women experience conflict and stress related to their job and family duties. You don’t have to be at Ground Zero to be in danger,” said Gretchen Dworznik, broadcasting instructor at Ashland University in Ohio.
»
|
COMMENTS
POST A COMMENT
| |
| BACK TO TOP | Copyright © 2003-2004 Xpress Online - Journalism Department - San Francisco State University |