Why is it that on-campus residency has spiked in numbers, yet there hasn’t been a spike in amenities to make SF State a better destination spot for nightlife and weekend activities? This place becomes a black hole when school is out; no pub, no ice cream socials, and meal variety is slim.
Let’s face it, when the sun goes down and one’s academic duties dissipate, the average student wants to enjoy the great indoors by eating, drinking, with a space to socialize and entertainment provided.
There is an equation for determining whether or not a university is or will become a party school. It goes like this: large volume of on-campus residents + small volume of on-campus night and weekend activities = parties in the residential halls. This is what’s happening at SF State and it should strike fear into the administration's souls.
Though the administration has long-term plans to increase SF State’s appeal to residents, the recent surge of freshmen (with nothing to do but party) should send a message the planning committee: GET MOVIN’!
That is because, the SFSU Housing Dept. does not want to affect surrounding neighborhoods, there is the SFSU Taskforce, and there is the issue of living in a community. The increase of enrollment accents the fact that the university has been lax in development of on-campus ammenities for the students currently enrolled. the increased costs of tuition, books, and life-style living over at parkmerced is attributed to efforts (joint) per my understanding of the university and parkmerced to suck as much cash as possible from the university students, and international students that they attract. The efforts at making SFSU a destination school is affecting the basic housing needed in the city. The need to party can always be satiated by going downtown and taxi cabbing it home. Promoting "vibrant" lifestyles in a residential area is not being conducive to the housing crisis students face both on and off campus. (talk to Jason Porth about the issue jporth@sfsu.edu)